Can I use the Leviton VP0SR-1LZ switch you suggested with my existing GE Master switch?
If you read the comments on Amazon, some people were successful at doing so. I personally didnāt try that.
One more thing to consider is the length of warranty which generally reflects the quality of the engineering of the device.
Not coincidentally, the more expensive devices, Leviton and Cooper, have significantly longer warranties. They offer five year limited warranties. The GEās and other switches of similar quality usually offer one or two year warranties. Whether that matters or not is a personal decision. I generally choose Longer warranty devices for things that have to be wired.
Another thing to be aware of is that a fairly significant percentage of GE/Jasco switches develop a problem about two years in where they donāt stay connected to the network. ( after the warranty period has expired.) Nothing to do with SmartThings, youāll find the same complaints on forums for other controllers. You have to cut the current at the breaker before theyāll respond again. There are several topics in these forums from people having this issue. I donāt know if the problem still exists with the newest models.
[quote=āJDRoberts, post:19, topic:25014, full:trueā]
(I think you and I have briefly discussed the patent issue before but let me just say again that the patent was issued at a time when no one was doing it and a lot of engineering research went into how to do it. The patent was done long before Z-wave even existed. So yes, it was a significant breakthrough at the time. And patent-worthy. A lot of things seem obvious after theyāre done the first time. )[/quote]
Well, if the patent was for HOW to send that communication, then Iāll grant that that is acceptable (not that anyone cares that much what I find acceptable. . ) But my understand was that it was for just the IDEA of reporting back. If Iām wrong Iāll back off my unreasonable hatred of Lutron⦠but I hate when facts get in the way of a good story.
This sounds kinda like what they were saying⦠it wasnāt a specific: āMy āonā button has been pressedā message, more of a general: āHey, look at me⦠something may have happenedā sort of message. When then caused the hub to do:
So my general understanding was right, just a number of the finer details were off.
Among those details that, GE switches do not instant report, nor do they ordinarily participate in an association. What was described was right as to instant reporting devices that use hail()
, but most devices do not.
Okay, this was bugging me so much that I did some searching to try and find the original info that I got. Hereās the thread where I quoted what someone from ST said to me that one of the engineers said to him⦠so, yeah⦠plenty of room for misunderstands here, butā¦
(Hereās the link.)
So it seems the GE/Jasco do send an association command⦠or at least thatās why the engineer said.
Itās always possible that the support person misunderstood the engineer. Or that the engineer misunderstood the question. Or that the question asked was not the question answered. (A common issue in communications between support and engineers.)
But in any case, you can always go to the Z wave alliance product site and look up the āconformance statementā for any certified zwave device and see exactly which command sets it supports.
To the best of my knowledge, none of the GE/Jasco wall switches support Association. But maybe thereās an individual model that does.
I believe most of the linear switches do support Association, some of the evolution switches do, I think the enerwave wall switches do not and their scene controllers do, but Iām not 100% sure on that. Cooper generally does. Thereās just a lot of variation not just from brand to brand, but from model to model within a brand. You just need to check the specs on any individual model youāre interested in.
The engineer may have been explaining to the support person how association can work even when the patent hasnāt been licensed, and the support person then assumed that applied to all switches. Who knows. you can look up the definitive answer on the Z wave alliance product site if youāre really curious.
Yup, all entirely possible.
But I guess the question I have then is this: If there isnāt some kind of message being sent that the Hub and see and then know to poll the device for itās current state, how does ST know when a light has been turned on or off? I have pretty much exclusively GE/Jasco switches and run SmartApps that trigger when they are turned on/off.
The app triggers anywhere from less than a second to 5 seconds later. Is the hub just polling all switches that often? (Note that Iām not using pollster on these at all). My understanding was/is that the Hub isnāt polling that fast⦠and this seems to be confirmed by other examples (ie⦠when a secondary controller turns on/off a switch it can take a long time ā minutes to even hours ā before ST notices that itās changed).
It would seem to me that something has to be signalling that a button press happened and therefore the Hub should investigate.
First off, you can see all of this in live logging. So fire that up and watch what happens on an individual device. For example, I can see my VRMX1 instant reporting dimmers send the hail()
command, which shows in the log as, UNHANDLED COMMAND Hail()
. Second, devices do eventually report without a poll. They just donāt do it āinstantlyā (there are clearly some semantics involved here). So what you are observing as between āless than a second to 5 seconds laterā is normal for most switches and dimmers. Sometimes it can be longer, and even 5 seconds is a problem in some circumstances.
Iāll try to play around with the live logging tonight because Iām very curious how this all works now. It still seems to me that something is going on that triggering the hub to ask the switch for itās current status⦠between what the engineer said as well as real world examples⦠it doesnāt feel like itās just whenever the node gets around to reporting to the hub.
But just cause it doesnāt feel that way to me doesnāt mean it isnāt, so Iāll try to research more when I can.
I just tried one of my regular dimmers, and curiously, it sends āApplication Busyā immediately when turned off. It didnāt report off until 55 seconds later (which seems incredibly long ā but ST has been flaky here this morning).
I wonder if it would be possible to come up with a modified device type that queries the device upon āApplication Busyā, to get āinstantā reporting out of those dimmers?
Are you sure the āapplication busyā wasnāt related to repeating a message?
Pretty sure. It happens with every physical press of the switch ā instantly. Nothing else in the logs, nothing else tied to that switchās on/off. Very interesting!!
Here is the log entry:
UNHANDLED COMMAND ApplicationBusy(status: 0, waitTime: 0)
So I tested last night. Hit on⦠nothing showed up in Live Logging, yes looking at the device it shows the correct status of āonā milliseconds after the button push. I did this with a couple of different GE switches. In every case nothing appears in Live Logging at all.
So⦠Iām at a loss. Unless the Hub is polling every device nearly instantly (which Iām nearly positive it isnāt), it feels (I hate using that work here, butā¦) like the switch has to be somehow signalling to the Hub that it was pressed.
I donāt have any other explanation for it otherwise.
Or the live logging feature is brokenā¦