Is there a way to replicate “when things quiet down” and “when things start happening” in the new app? I would like to get rid of the old app altogether but I still have key routines running on these conditions.
Yes. It’s just motion and not motion for X minutes
If you’re using Smart Lighting, the same SmartApp works the same way using the same data in both versions of the app
I have attached screenshots to provide greater clarity to my question. These features are an option for automating a routine in the Classic app. Hope someone can help.
The equivalent in the new app would be an automation with those same motion sensors on the IF side with each set to “no motion for 15 minutes”.
Thanks @prjct92eh2 - I did happen to give that a shot. However, I was unable to replicate the same behavior. As one example, unless at least one of the motion sensors in the type of automation configuration you suggested is triggered with a ‘no motion’ event during that period, then the ‘Then’ clause would not trigger at all. In the Classic app, it would simply trigger immediately at the earliest time (at 11:15pm) if none of the motion sensor’s “no motion” event had been triggered within the previous fifteen minutes. The results I would get seemed very unpredictable. Maybe I was doing something wrong, but perhaps others have had better results?
ah, I see. So in the automation in the new app the time range doesn’t act as a trigger? What if you have two automations, one for time range and one for a specific time?
I would say that the time range in the new app is relevant and provides a framework for at least one of those triggering events to occur. But logically, I need the “when things quiet down” to trigger if they have already been quiet when that time range begins. Instead, the new app seems to want at least one event to occur during that time period. So if everyone has already been in bed, someone has to get up to trigger a “no motion” event. Does that make sense?
makes sense. The time range is acting more as a “filter” instead of a trigger to start the automation. I’d be curious if a specific time automation can use the time as a trigger.
I’ll play with your idea of using two different automations, but in my previous testing even when the automation triggered in the middle of the time range, it would not trigger as was anticipated. It was like the function would look at each individual motion sensor and only trigger when each of those sensors realized a ‘no motion’ event, which kind of makes sense since the “And” operator is looking for each event to occur. Which, several of those sensors were not likely activated during that time range. Instead of only offering an “And” operator for each sensor, it seems we would need either a “no motion” Or a “Null” event to indicate there was no activity at all.
Here is a screenshot of one of my test automations attempting to duplicate the old “when things quiet down” in the new app:
It appears that the automation does not work as intended during the period specified. The automation won’t trigger at all until at least one of the motion sensors register a 15 minute ‘no motion’, which is not the way the old “when things quiet down” works. Does anyone have any other experience trying to replicate “when things quiet down”?
I still use many SmartApps originally designed from Classic in the new app, especially now since those can be installed via the new app as long as you have them published in the IDE. Until the new app implements more capabilities with Automations, and eventually Rules API, why don’t you continue to use “when things quiet down” with the new app?
This is one of the last items I need to replicate in order to get rid of the old Classic app altogether. This particular item was a part of a “routine” in the old app, that is not found in the new app (unless I’m missing something). Just asking if anyone has figured out a workaround. I assume they will formally replicate all of these features, but without a public outline of future features I would have no way of being certain. It just seems like it would be such a small and simple feature to program, (says the guy who isn’t a programmer).