Using the example of three lamps and one overhead, I would name based on position of the end device facing into the room at the door. (You could also base it on where you most often control the device (like from where I sit in the Den).) Assume Master Bedroom:
Master Left
Master Center
Master Right
Master Ceiling
This groups by location and also by location position. Easy to remember verbally and logical.
In the way that you mean, no, I donât have much problem. but I donât have many smart lights as of yet. The issue I have is with the separate name scheme between ST, Hue and Google Home (or Alexa). Doesnât matter what theyâre called in ST, so I use a specific naming convention that works well for coding and natural sorting ("!Light - Dining 1"). The names in Hue donât matter either, but they need to be grouped into rooms for dimmer switches, so they could be named accordingly (âbedroom 2â rather than ânightstandâ). The only names that matter are for voice control. But in Home (dunno with Alexa), you can create multiple names for each device, like âporchâ, âstoopâ, âdeckâ and âoutsideâ. This is mostly only important for guests to not feel like they need to know the secret code-words.*
Personally, I go with location (âporchâ), but you could also consider function. Thereâs no reason you couldnât name lights and rooms like you would the routines, like âleavingâ, âreadingâ, âcookingâ, âgood nightâ/âsleepingâ, etc. Just a thought.
* There should be a way in Google and Alexa to prompt for more information. For instance, if you say âTurn the lightsâ, it could then ask follow-up questions. âWhich room?â ⌠âThe porchâ. And, continue to prompt, until it knows what to do. âOutside in front, back or both?â One of these days, Iâm going to figure out how to⌠find a friend to do that for me.