From an engineering standpoint, that is a seriously bad article. Egregiously bad. It’s describing matter as though it were a transport layer, which it is not. And it gets a lot of things wrong. For one thing, the author appears to have no understanding that matter does not define the UI in any way. Also, they misunderstand the difference between a thread border router and a matter controller. You only need one thread border router, but you need one controller for each platform that you want to use.
So in this case, a non-engineer has oversimplified the situation to the point where it’s no longer true. Annoying.
(I was asked for a specific example…)
This, for example, is completely not the right analogy.
Think of Matter as the USB connector for smart home devices.
Instead, let’s use the typical post office analogy. The transport protocols like Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Zigbee, thread, are the system of trucks responsible for delivering Messages based on their address. They have no idea what’s inside the packages and envelopes they are delivering and they don’t care. They just want to know where to deliver it and if it meets their specifications for size and weight and all that.
Matter is like a set of checklist forms that go inside the envelopes. They make it easier for the recipient to understand what the sender wants, because the request has been standardized. So they make sure that whichever Home Automation platform you are using, a request telling a lightbulb to dim to 50% always has the same information whether you are using Apple Home or SmartThings or Google home or whatever.
Matter should make it simpler for the end customer not because anything about the hardware or the systems delivering the messages has changed. But rather because the The format for the message content has been standardized. The stuff that goes inside the envelopes.
Matter has nothing to do with how many delivery trucks there are or how often they go or what kind of terrain they can cross.
Messages are still physically delivered the same way they always were. Nothing has changed in that. All that’s changed Is the format for the content of the message, again, what’s inside the envelopes.
I think pretty much everybody can understand that, whether they have strong technical skills or not. If you’re going to introduce a whole new analogy, it should at least be one that’s accurate about what’s going on.
IMHO, of course.