I just wanted to clarify one thing. Only the ADT motion and Door/Window sensors are proprietary and need the ADT Smartthings hub. I can vouch for the water sensors to work on hibitat. After the fiasco around the speculated end of it on January 1st i already started the migration to Hubitat. I moved all of my regular sensors and all automations to hubitat already. I am already replacing the door/window sensors and motion sensors with Ring Gen 2 sensors that are Zwave 7 with S2. About half are there now. For a DIY option this seems to be a rock solid option as well.
I am really impressed with the Ring Gear. It paired easily and has been supper fast.
Interesting. My experience with my Ring cameras is that the WiFi is pitifully weak, and super, super slow… When it works it’s nice, but 45 secconds from launch of app to interaction with the camera is common and makes the interactivity features pointless.
So let me get this right, they’re going to brick my Fire, CO, Water Leak and Security Alarm not just the ability to send remote alerts but also local alarms! All with just 90 days notice. While the offer of some compensation might seem attractive, they want us to dismantle and return the equipment 1st. I hope the list of properties doesn’t become public as we’d be obvious targets. I have this in multiple properties and need to travel across a couple of states in the middle of a pandemic to fix this. Not sure if I should call my insurance company 1st or my lawyer?
As @JDRoberts indicated. Those devices are using proprietary frequencies, or something about them is proprietary, at least.
That had me wondering who the proprietor is, ADT or Samsung? I can see that if it is ADT why there wouldn’t be an effort to adapt them, but if it is Samsung, I think it is a waste. But then again, maybe it really is so much more complex than a simple interpreter device.
But, yeah… looks like they are headed to the scrap heap, unless they can be used without connectivity.
Yeah, I have 7 of those, and they pair right up, no problem. Apparently some other devices do too, reportedly. But that isn’t the case with the Smoke and Carbon Monoxide detectors unfortunately. Might be Z-wave(non standard) vs Zigbee that makes the difference.
Zwave is just as “standard” as Zigbee, and probably more so, since every zwave device has to go through certification by the zwave alliance in order to use the name of the protocol. That is not true for Zigbee.
Both standards allow for “manufacturer proprietary” message profiles, but zwave still requires that the device respond to “basic” ( that has a specific meaning in a zwave context) commands, while Zigbee does not.
So any certified zwave device can be added to any certified zwave hub and will at least respond to on and off, which is not true for Zigbee. This is the “interoperable” part of the zwave standard.
However, there is a regional aspect to zwave which you may be thinking of. Zwave has different radio frequencies in different regions, in order to avoid interference with local first responder and mobile phone communications. Zigbee offers a global frequency which is the same everywhere.
The ADT/SmartThings dual logo sensors use neither zwave nor Zigbee and operate on a frequency different from both, requiring a special radio which is not available in any other SmartThings hub. Or any other ADT panel. It was a joint product of both companies. There was one exception: the leak sensor, which was just rebadged, so that one can be used with a regular ST hub.
BTW, many security companies use a proprietary communications protocol in part to discourage hacking. That’s not unusual in this market niche.
It’s hard not to feel defrauded in this situation as an owner. I don’t give half a rip about the ADT monitoring, but there isn’t really a valid reason aside from the fact that Samsung and ADT want their joint project dead, to disable it. If they want to do the righ thing and offer us a full refund on ADT ST equipment the same way Lowes did with Iris, I would consider staying with Samsung / Smartthings. But even then, it seems like since it is more or less cloud based, and at the whim of the manufacturer, I really don’t want that.
I seriously don’t understand how it is so expensive for these companies to support a cloud based product, then the get product out of the cloud and do local processing. They can’t use much more than a Raspberry Pi worth of processing and memory. Or at least a slightly upgraded SOC of sorts…
Yes there are some that plan on replacing their systems every few years. I haven’t even fully deployed my intended system yet so no. I think longer term as I believe most people do. I am building this into my house, not tacking it onto the outlets and just screwing in bulbs.
Conbine that with the loss of cloud services which happens often and you lose control of your devices, and, well these systems have a LONG way to go reliability wise, and the cloud direction that is oh so popular with these companies for some reason (yeah lets use someone elses computer and put all our info on the net…) just seems like a bad way to do it…
Yes I am ranting. Sorry. This has me genuinely annoyed as they keep changing it up while I am trying to finish it off and have not come up with the fully deployed system I wanted yet…
Yeah I completely agree. Even my house has an old ADT alarm system from 10 years ago. Sure i cant connect it to ADT anymore without upgrading but it didnt just magically stop working by a software design. I can still set the alarm and do everything locally. To expect that a 3 year old product magically is worthless by a forced design is mind blowing to me.
I think the perception that it isn’t costing them allot is a bit off. Even a raspberry pi’ amount of CPU for a few million people would add up to a fairly significant amount. I really hope Hubitat can capitalize on this. I feel like they have the magic sauce if they can do both cloud and local execution leaning mostly on local.
Hubitat was always suppose to have some kind of subscription cost associated with certain cloud functions. They are also working on a service that helps with replacement and backup and recovery of the environment.
My parents have a 25 year old alarm system thay can still be monitored. Yea it uses a POTS line but it works.