@kkniffin...you handled that better than I'm about to lol.
Why is it automatically assumed that if someone wants to be on the last known updated code that their intent is to distribute? Is there now Rule Machine Police? This is absurdly ridiculous...grown adults acting like the soup nazi!
"NO SOUP FOR YOU!"
I bet it's safe to assume that anyone saying "I agree 100%" to not distributing the code has their soup already...ahhh, the privileged conveniently standing by the cause...it's an uprising!...a revolt even!...those less fortunate suffer.
Yes...I meant suffer...as in I did not overstate. .
Don't distribute?...what about in instances where it could help someone care for their child?...give solutions for those with disabilities?...help the elderly?...is the expense of the good that the app can do for others really worth whatever the (now) seemingly selfish reasoning is?
To be clear...I've honored this; however, it is doing no good for anyone. This is the very reason why I wanted to donate. When I asked if I could donate I was told to "pay it forward"; therefore, I will do so as empowered.
It's not about developers (or any one of us)...and it's not about arm wrestling SmartThings into doing what you (and may others) feel is right!