Sorry guys, I’m siding with the critic Brett on this one. I’ve been watching the Brilliant announcement since day one (January I believe?), I’ve read the reviews (that read like advertisements almost - on Engadget, Verve, all over. And then I go take a look at their website and what they advertise they do. And I ordered some switches…
And now I’ve come to the same realization as Brett - they misled us. I agree with you and Benji that being an early adopter can be rough. But @gaurav_brilliant Brilliant shouldn’t be misleading us like they are that, this is a SWITCH. Tgauchat, this isn’t a Kickstarter or Indiegogo campaign, this is an up and running website shipping final product with misleading advertising that they don’t tell you anywhere doesn’t do the basic function they advertise that they do - control lights.
While all these other integrations (Sonos, eventual SmartThings, Alexa, etc) are nice and cool, let’s all remember (and Brilliant and @gaurav_brilliant please take note) - there are 7 million devices out there that integrate with Alexa and SmarThings etc - we can control lights with our phone, our iPad, apps, Echo, Show, Alexa, voice - a million ways and with a million things. But, here’s the novel concept you’re (Brilliant) is missing - people are buying this thing for ONE MAIN REASON- it’s LIGHT SWITCH FORM FACTOR. If we wanted to control our lights with Alexa, we have Echo, Ecobee Switch, etc. If we wanted to control our lights with SmartThings, well, SmartThings ALREADY DOES THAT. So, what we want to be able to control our lights (notice lights, not one light bulb) with - is a SWITCH.
Bottom line there are still people - visitors, kids, grandma, etc who come by and walk into a room and need to be able to turn our smart lights on and off. They don’t know how to talk to Alexa or want to get out a phone. They want to touch a light switch. And that is why people are buying Brilliant. I can get Alexa, Sonos and Smartthings integrations in Echo show, my iPad and other devices. What I need Brilliant for is to control LIGHTS. The rest is gravy. But they just served me a plate of cold gravy with no potatoes.
So that is why people want and buy things like Wink Relay, the ill fated Plum, and now Brilliant - because you are advertising (and reviewers are misleading us) by saying you control LIGHTS. But we’ve now found, and you’ve admitted above, that you don’t. You can control ONE LIGHT BULB. This isn’t early adopting technology. I’d let you get away with that 3 or 4 years ago - yes, it might have been tough then. But this is 2018 - many have come before. Many control LIGHTS and ROOMS now. You can’t launch a smart LIGHT SWITCH product that doesn’t control LIGHTS.
And I appreciate @AdamHLG optimism and desires for workarounds, but again, it sounds like SmartThings integration is further off than Hue, it’s a workaround, and why should you buy a $399 light switch that is supposed to control LIGHTS and now have to figure out how to make it trigger other things as a workaround that they should have built in? And is the SmartThings trigger going to allow dimming, rooms, groups, etc?
How can Alexa, Ecobee, and many other simple App Store apps that connect to HUE’s API see rooms and groups and this $399 light switch that advertises it has HUE integration can’t?
Returning our 4 switches as well, frustratingly, unless an update is pushed this week that fixes this shortcoming.